Comments on: OpenPKG 4.0 licenses explained http://www.lotterer.net/blog/en/274-openpkg-4-0-licenses-explained You didn't ask for it but we tell you anyway Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:38:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: jmdesp http://www.lotterer.net/blog/en/274-openpkg-4-0-licenses-explained/comment-page-1#comment-35679 jmdesp Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:31:39 +0000 http://www.lotterer.net/blog/?p=274#comment-35679 Would you consider updating the http://www.openpkg.org/documentation/faq/ page so that it corresponds to this new framework ? It's not obvious for a newcomer that "openpkg license list" lists the already locally available licences, amongst which you can then switch with "openpkg license activate". There seems to be something broken with the package browser, since, whilst it says it should be correct, "openpkg build gcc45" fails, as well as "build gcc43", "build gcc41", "build gcc4", "build gcc3". Fortunately "openpkg build gcc" does build gcc 45 but I have no idea what I should do if I need another version. Maybe I missed something. Would you consider updating the http://www.openpkg.org/documentation/faq/ page so that it corresponds to this new framework ?

It’s not obvious for a newcomer that “openpkg license list” lists the already locally available licences, amongst which you can then switch with “openpkg license activate”.

There seems to be something broken with the package browser, since, whilst it says it should be correct, “openpkg build gcc45″ fails, as well as “build gcc43″, “build gcc41″, “build gcc4″, “build gcc3″. Fortunately “openpkg build gcc” does build gcc 45 but I have no idea what I should do if I need another version. Maybe I missed something.

]]>